Expressen’s editor: Our apology still stands
Written by Lars-Erik_Olson on August 22, 2003 to Marie Fredriksson.
STOCKHOLM - Otto Sjöberg, Expressen’s editor-in-chief, stands by his apology to Marie Fredriksson, in spite of new developments in the legal proceedings reported yesterday.
Sjöberg declined to comment to Martin Jönsson, a reporter for Journalisten (a magazine and website for Swedish journalists), about the fact that the libel trial against him has now been postponed. He also doesn’t want to comment on the information about Marie Fredriksson in legal counselor Peter Danowsky’s letter to Fredriksson’s lawyer, where it is claimed that Expressen had at the time received new information about her health condition.
However, he stresses that the apology published last spring, where he apologized to Marie Fredriksson for letting the newspaper speculate about her health condition, is not affected by these new developments.
“I apologized for speculating about her test results, and that it could’ve been a malignant tumor. We had information about a new lump – information that we’ve all along maintained was credible – but it was wrong of us to speculate. It was a mistake. But it won’t affect the legal process, or what happens now,” Sjöberg says.
Marie Fredriksson’s attorney, Leif Silbersky, interprets yesterday’s happenings as Expressen retracting their previous apology: “Their actions are completely absurd. First they maintain that they are right, then they back off and apologize, and now they retract the whole thing [just] before the trial. I’ve never seen anything quite like it.”
- Journalisten’s article (in Swedish)
Other articles with the same topic
- Marie to perform at Citytunneln inauguration (October 27, 2010)
- Marie pushes Roxette into prestigious Australian Countdown! (December 1, 2009)
- Marie Fredriksson turns 51 (May 31, 2009)
- Roxette reunion special to air on Nordic Rox; Marie special on Swedish P4 (May 28, 2009)
- Marie joins Per and band on stage in Amsterdam (May 7, 2009)
8 comments
Roxeanne said on August 23, 2003 10:33:
actually, i do not understand why it’d make things better IF their article was based on facts (which is,btw, quite possible: lumbs can appear for any reason, eg. as a presign to menstruation!).
it still was a nasty thing of them to release it, not to speak of the horrible way HOW they did it!!!!
Sparvogamarie said on August 24, 2003 02:16:
I’m working on an anti-Expressen site to help Marie...if anyone is interested in helping, email [email protected] ! I’ll keep you posted what I decide to do.
LittleSpooky said on August 23, 2003 00:46:
Expressen should still be held accountable for their actions. As for the monetary compensation, I don’t have an opinion on that one way or the other.