The Daily Roxette discussions forum has been closed. The forum is only available as a read-only archive.
Bin Laden is dead?
10 replies
Santi said on September 23, 2006 15:00:
For those who read French:
http://www.estrepublicain.fr/zoom/2006092300222348.html
For those who don’t, it says that reliable sources (contacted by the saudi secret service) has said that Osama Bin Laden could have died of typhoid. The source has been considered to be reliable enough as to communicate this to the highest authorities of the Republic of France.
Anyway, what do you think of this?
ally77 said on September 23, 2006 15:42:
Well if he is then good, I hope he suffered in the process!
plectrum said on September 23, 2006 15:54:
Heard nothing on the news channel but if true then thats excellent news
Debora said on September 23, 2006 19:09:
I agree with kuryliw, what difference would it really make? There are still a lot of terrorists in the world.
Oldag75 said on September 23, 2006 23:57:
Twould be ironic if an extremely wealthy, albeit third-world icon of this nature succumbed to a primative disease... which has been completely conquered/erased in the First World. Typhus was a big problem in the Nazi concentration camps, because the disease did not differentiate between captors and captives. If that worthless – worse than worthless – individual is gone, the ignoble nature of his passing is eminently appropriate punctuation for the sad excuse of a life he lived.
LittleSpooky said on September 24, 2006 00:10:
I doubt seriously he’s been alive for a couple of years now. Too much tells me he’s been dead for at least 3 years.
ally77 said on September 24, 2006 08:28:
Well if you choose to live in a cave to avoid getting arrested you get all you deserve!
rox-kuryliw said on September 23, 2006 15:18:
dont know, what difference would it really make, my guess non !.