The Negative Publicity starts
DEFAULT_GREEN said on September 4, 2006 11:34:
Wikipedia:
The cover art for the new single will show Per and Marie in a bowling alley:
1. (which has shown to be very controversial among fans for its poor quality)
The new video will be made up of new and old images from different music videos by roxette over the years. Unreleased Tracks included in the huge Rox Box collection are: Reveal, One Wish, New World, Staring at the Ground (demo), Myths, Cry (demo), Love Spins, and many more. The second new song featured in the forthcoming greatest hits album is called “Reveal”.
2. Many fans feel they have been sold short as the rox box is 75% made up of past album tracks is 3 songs never heard before only.
Sascha said on September 4, 2006 12:49:
I think a dictionary shouldn’t be the place for personal opinions. It’s just for facts! Someone should edit that out. Nobody knows how many fans are really disappointed/overjoyed! And the single cover is still NOT confirmed by Rox or EMI to be the final version...
miss-misery said on September 4, 2006 12:50:
Maybe the person who updated Wikipedia was among all those who are complaining, and complaining, and complaining everyday about the Box :)
abysmo said on September 4, 2006 13:01:
The sleeve picture is good, it´s good idea, but these stars and titles, two different fonts, too big, touching Marie´s head. As I said, it´s good idea behind this sleeve, but the final feeling looks like it is little bit shoddy. That´s the main problem. But don´t talk about sleeve, hope that we will talk about song. I believe it will be great song.
Sascha said on September 4, 2006 13:03:
Where did you get confirmation that it’s not a work-in-progress version? I found it only in the rox20 gallery, not the discography...
bevi said on September 4, 2006 13:09:
Exactly, a dictionary should be more objective and not talking about personal opinion... we are killing Roxette, is that what we want?
purplemedusa said on September 4, 2006 13:24:
Sascha .... maybe u should find a dictionary and look up what it actually is! BTW It’s a FACT that many fans ONLINE was upset! Duh!
abysmo said on September 4, 2006 13:31:
OK, some things could be inconsistent but I think it´s time to swallow these details and look into the future. We said everything, it´s nothing to add. And if we want to discuss, we can discuss about the music. Hope we´ll forget the sleeve when we´ll hear the song.
Sascha said on September 4, 2006 13:34:
I know what a dictionary is! That’s the reason why many people see that whole wiki thing quite sceptic. I could easily go to wikipedia and add another sentence: “Many fans instantly fall in love with that wonderful uplifting single cover.” Cool, huh?
btw. I hate the cover. ;-)
Edit: Sorry, I just mixed the words. dictionary = Wörterbuch, encyclopedia = Lexikon in german. That doesn’t change my opinion.
StephenDH said on September 4, 2006 14:00:
1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a dictionary.
2. This has got totally out of hand seriously, the way this is going I have a feeling there isn’t going to be anymore Roxette after this. I hope that I am wrong. I’m trying personally to be as positive about this as possible for myself.
3. Fan made negative publicity is the last thing a band needs so that crap off wikipedia should be erased.
4. I’m sure i’m going to get cyber-bashed for these comments, oh well.
pwbbounce (moderator) said on September 4, 2006 14:11:
@StephenDH - I’m totally with you. What do you expect the critics to be like if the “fans” are dissing the band???
purplemedusa said on September 4, 2006 14:15:
Good thing someone started this thread, now I can copy&paste it back! *evil grin*
Nah seriously not going slit my wrists over the latest events... and choose to believe that the magic will return; I think I was WAY to spoiled with Per & Helena’s adventures... jeez still can’t put the Dancing Plumber CD down!!
rox-kuryliw said on September 4, 2006 14:29:
interesting points, i think roxette need to be careful to please the fans they have a find /get back old ones. hard for them to do. BUt they could handle it better.
And that one wish cover YUK no wonder Aussie arent getting the single lol I bet EMI saw that shity cover i thought no one is gonna buy this, I dont blame them one bit.
RJ1976 said on September 4, 2006 16:20:
I like the new covers.... Much better than the old ones...
How do you do was a bad cover.... This is GREAT :)
Roxette-atic said on September 4, 2006 16:34:
I guess im one of the few who REALLY likes the sleeve for “One Wish”. They look so happy in taht pic :D
freddyhardest said on September 4, 2006 16:38:
“Wikipedia:
The cover art for the new single will show Per and Marie in a bowling alley:
1. (which has shown to be very controversial among fans for its poor quality)
The new video will be made up of new and old images from different music videos by roxette over the years. Unreleased Tracks included in the huge Rox Box collection are: Reveal, One Wish, New World, Staring at the Ground (demo), Myths, Cry (demo), Love Spins, and many more. The second new song featured in the forthcoming greatest hits album is called “Reveal”.
2. Many fans feel they have been sold short as the rox box is 75% made up of past album tracks is 3 songs never heard before only.”
I think this is 100% true, so ¿What´s the problem?
davidc4 said on September 4, 2006 16:53:
aaaaaaaaggggggg
ggggghhhhh!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thats it edited
davidc4 said on September 4, 2006 16:55:
sorry........but i felt like screaming then...as i have done everytime ive looked at this page in the last few days.....
we should be HAPPY that they are releasing ANYTHING after the last few years.its better than nothing.
freddyhardest said on September 4, 2006 17:07:
Then, I won´t say anything more about the cover, the rox box, etc for the next days.
Until they come to light, that´s it.
davidc4 said on September 4, 2006 17:13:
its pathetic...we should be happy not whinging..im pleased that it happenin.very pleased.
ok im disappointed that fireworks isnt on it but hey
i can live with it
ally77 said on September 4, 2006 12:27:
and who updated that I wonder...