Glossy versus matt sleeve
mdekort said on August 23, 2003 23:24:
I need some help.
Some of the newer singles (WICF and newer) were made in a matt cardboard sleeve and in a glossy cardboard sleeve. They both have the same number and the same CD, how can I see which version I’ve got. Just see if it reflects light???? Anyone who can help me out, please do!!
Thnx in advance
Marc
tevensso (moderator) said on August 24, 2003 10:24:
If you have the glossy version, you’ll see it easily.
mdekort said on August 24, 2003 13:00:
How can I see it easily, cause to my knowledge I have one version, so I can’t compare it. Does it shine more and reflects light, the glossy version???
tevensso (moderator) said on August 24, 2003 13:46:
Yes, the glossy version is VERY shiny. The matt version is just... dull. Compare it to a normal jewel case CDS. Also the matt versions are misprints, the real sleeves were supposed to be shiny.
ATLTK said on August 24, 2003 14:11:
are they rare
I think I only have 1 version cant see any diffrence
PerAndren said on August 24, 2003 15:51:
Ted: the glossy ones are glossy (glansiga)
the matt ones are matt (matta)
Compare for example the booklet in Room Service - which is GLOSSY, with the booklet in Look Sharp which is MATT...
PerAndren said on August 24, 2003 22:32:
GLOSSY are not generally rarer... but if there where released more matt sleeves than glossy ones, than that obviously makes the GLOSSY ones rarer....
DaminehGessle said on August 25, 2003 05:37:
I dislike glossy ones as they are fragile!! They fall apart so easily just like Mazarin’s.
ditroia said on August 25, 2003 07:10:
All the Australian Bookletts, Inserts and Card Sleeve Singles are Matte, Most european Booklets and Inserts are Glossy.
Dave
TheRain1981 said on August 30, 2003 07:07:
I love the glossy sleeves. ’The Ballad Hits’ raspberry shines (and looks more realistic) much more than the matte version. ;)
ATLTK said on August 24, 2003 09:44:
???????