shoudl have ahd a better strategy
coyboyusa said on March 13, 2003 21:58:
these hits packages shoudl have been double cd’s with all the new tracks so they could have us vote on the singles so we could have new rox music for a whle year lol
marcusvandeursen said on March 13, 2003 22:37:
@coyboyusa: so... why don’t you mail this proposition to [email protected]?
Mfan28179-Jason said on March 14, 2003 02:46:
I think what would have made these compilations more interesting would be having a second disc with acoustic versions of all the songs on disc 1. Somewhat like the Abbey Road Sessions.
coyboyusa said on March 15, 2003 00:22:
ok for all the sarcastic idiots on here here is what i meant to say
the strategy for the compilations was all wrong...they could have made it a 2 cd set with the new tracks as single b-sides ..that way we’d have new music for a whole year....the singles would be bigger hits cause new material would be on them and peopel would buy them as they did the hand singles.
animalkingdom said on March 15, 2003 12:43:
@ coyboy
in case you’re wondering my comment was not for you :)
Mfan28179-Jason said on March 16, 2003 12:33:
I think what Coyboy is saying is that the new songs on the EPs should have been saved for the b-sides of the commercial singles (and therefore, a limited edition EP with the current songs would have been unnecessary.) For example, if Capitol were to release “Breathe” as a single, they could have included “It Hurts” or “Every Day” or both as the b-side(s). That way we would have new songs to look forward to if Capitol were to promote more than one single from each compilation album.
camillarox said on March 13, 2003 22:24:
LOL where did you learn to type? :)