A big loss of Roxette, another clever step
lawyer said on July 19, 2004 18:49:
Comment removed by author
tevensso (moderator) said on July 19, 2004 19:09:
Why didn’t the 428 sites get together to pay for the domain then? roxette.org has never been official in any way.
StillFar said on July 19, 2004 20:07:
maybe you guys should ask Per to sponsor it...but then again, as bad as roxette.se sucks, I doubt he is interested in anything on the web
rox-kuryliw said on July 19, 2004 21:25:
I only know roxette were still around form the internet in 1998, if it wasnt for the net i would have guessed they split after DBUGTTC in the UK.
purplemedusa said on July 20, 2004 00:38:
I’d love to know who complained... he/she will sure get a death-stare from me!!
sfchemist said on July 20, 2004 09:55:
Huh? I’ve missed something. What’s going on?
forget it. I just found the other thread
AURYTE said on July 20, 2004 12:29:
I also wonder what I have missed. Could someone me the situation???
ncurran said on July 20, 2004 14:25:
the “files” is refering to another thread, where it was mentioned roxette.org was closed down because of copyright issues.
coyboyusa said on July 20, 2004 22:05:
there had to be more going on than just copyright issues cause they could have easily just shut down the offending sites ...i wonder if this means theres gonna be a move to open up roxettes musical vaults then if this is true tho>?
Sparvogamarie said on July 22, 2004 08:36:
I must have missed something, when did Roxette.org close down??? I never saw an email from Dan! Can someone explain what happened? Thx.
arnie said on July 23, 2004 12:26:
if that was the real reason, they should have removed the stuff that violates the copyright, but there were many site (my site for instance) in which there were no such files, only information and pictures.
Santi said on July 19, 2004 18:58:
And who did it? You talk like if it was Per himself to decide that...