The Daily Roxette discussions forum has been closed. The forum is only available as a read-only archive.
Michael Jackson you naughty boy!
84 replies
Vixzter said on November 19, 2003 19:15:
Vixzter said on November 19, 2003 19:23:
exactly ;)
I should’ve put ....Micheal Jackson you naughty boy AGAIN! ;)
I wonder how much the pay off will be this time ;)
purplemedusa said on November 19, 2003 19:28:
Vixz you know how to use those puns... love the intertextual usage of “boy”...
>>>A great big spanky for MJ
Vixzter said on November 19, 2003 20:03:
If he went to jail would they have to confiscate his nose? I mean its not really attached is it? ;)
Vixzter said on November 19, 2003 20:05:
Do you reckon if he doesn’t give himself up we’ll have a chase like OJ Simpsons?? ;) how cool would that be ;)
coyboyusa said on November 19, 2003 22:38:
lol what will they be chasing him on a merrygo round or a carnival pony?
MiracleMan said on November 19, 2003 23:24:
Or moonwalking down the freeway? Meanwhile, back at the ranch. . .
News stated thet an arrest warrant for Calif. was issued and bail is to be set at $3Million. It’s interesting that his Number Ones compilation came out (yesterday?). He’s in Vegas now, lets see how long it takes for him to go back home.
EDIT: (Wow! I had a $3 for bail—even I could make that!)
MiracleMan said on November 19, 2003 23:30:
OH MY GOD! THERE’S AN AD FOR THRILLER AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE!!!!! ROTFLOL
DaminehGessle said on November 20, 2003 01:27:
It’s easy to take someone down, isn’t it? Michael Jackson is a fine man. He might be weird and act childish. That’s his problem. All the allegations are bullshit I think.
MiracleMan said on November 20, 2003 04:51:
Sorry, but that remains to be seen, and I suspect we’ll be seeing A LOT of it in the coming days, at least in the US.
LittleSpooky said on November 20, 2003 05:10:
The bail was set at $3million USD. Someone has a typo.
And D: Who says the allegations are false (besides his representation and himself). I’m sorry, but accusations have been made in the past and he SETTLED. He never plead no contest or anything of the sort in court... and I hate to say it, no I don’t... I don’t hate to say it at all:
It SCREAMS of guilt.
sweet_stalker57 said on November 20, 2003 06:30:
ever see that Tommy Davidson video of billy-jean?
it went something like:
“he looked cute in those skin tight jeans
barely thirteen
I said would you like to come with me
we could have fun
on my ranch
in the dark
with a llama”
kachina008 said on November 20, 2003 07:36:
oh *GOD*
we can be arguing the “did he, didn’t he” for ages. I really wonder who the victim is here.
coyboyusa said on November 20, 2003 14:41:
the allegations are bullshit?
are they? this is by recrod what may be the 10th time a chld has either brought official or civil charges against him.. his siblings have said there was physical and sexual abuse in the family at their fathers hands. pedophiles perpetrate the abus ethey recieve on others so is it that far off to say that he may just have done it? after all noone thpought that guy from the who was a peodphile even thought he was a bused by men when he was a chikld and he was busted for downloading kiddie porn..
zaine said on November 20, 2003 17:19:
not going either way here, but bare in mind that it was only a few months ago that there was the MJ documentary on tv a few months ago showing that people had won money etc from claims like this. not saying they personally are lying, but some people can be greedy and get ideas...
StillFar said on November 20, 2003 17:25:
I don’t understand the parents of these kids. I mean, that story is in the news since 92. I wonder why a person would still send the kid to Michael’s house for sleepovers? Helloooooo!
DaminehGessle said on November 20, 2003 17:26:
zaine I agree. Oh well I don’t have enough time in my hands to talk about this and this is very subjective. SO have fun with the thread.
rox-kuryliw said on November 20, 2003 23:25:
Iv never liked michael jackson much , some of his songs are ok i guess, but havent got one of his songs. I made my mind up when i watched that programme on him in the UK, and that something needs to be done about him. ! If he was a UK normal person hanging his kid off the side of a building he would be arrested . Thats my view.
LittleSpooky said on November 21, 2003 05:20:
Coyboy: AND HE WAS CLEARED OF ALL WRONG DOING!
For those wondering, coy is referring to Peter Townshend. The claim was that he was downloading kiddie porn. He WASN’T. Police NEVER found any on his computer OR in his home OR possession. What they found were websites. Now, he HAS been CLEARED of all charges, but according to British Law, he has to be registered on the National Sex Offenders List for a minimum of 5 years.
Mr. Townshend claimed abuse in the past by his father and has been using his resources to SHUT DOWN kiddie porn sites. If I had the money, I’d do it too. So if that makes me guilty of having kiddie porn, so be it. But it says a lot when there’s no concrete proof against Mr. Townshend and he still has to be registered.
Coy, I WISH you would get your facts straight before opening your mouth. You make the rest of us Americans look bad.
coyboyusa said on November 22, 2003 15:38:
sppoky he was not CLEARED of anything. the family was paid off and the boy refused to testify in a CRMINAL court....so there were no charges ever brought against him...get ur facts right
mattias said on November 22, 2003 17:17:
When I see that insane FUBAR prosecutor smiling on TV sayin’ “this time we’re gonna nail him” I know it’s all bullshit. *shivers*
LittleSpooky said on November 22, 2003 17:22:
Coyboy: I’m talking of Peter Townshend. IF you bothered to read my ENTIRE post, not ONCE did I mention Michael Jackson. I think that son-of-a-bitch is as guilty as the day is long up in Alaska during the summer!
MiracleMan said on November 22, 2003 18:47:
Mattias—that remains to be seen. Just because they couldn’t prosecute him 10 years ago doesn’t necessarily qualify it as bullshit. California changed it’s law BECAUSE of that very case from a decade ago. But we’ll see how it works out January 9th, as that’s when the court case rolls into action.
animalkingdom said on November 22, 2003 20:43:
I SO seriously believe he hasn’t harrassed those kids in any way! It’s just the sick mind of those peeps who like to offer their children the best time in their life and later cash in with filthy lies.
Too bad not many stay beside Jackson!
LittleSpooky said on November 23, 2003 06:02:
I quit likin him the day he started lookin whiter than me.
Come on! A rare skin disease that makes a nose look like that?? Not to mention that no one else in the family (dating back SEVERAL generations) has this affliction?? It’s not communicable or else there would be TONS of others suffering from it.
animalkingdom said on November 23, 2003 09:15:
@ above
But what have his diseases or plastic surgery got to do with this...?
sweet_stalker57 said on November 25, 2003 07:00:
“little Billy is not my lover
he’s just a kid who
claims that I pressed his buns
but I swear I didn’t get none!”
sing it!
tevensso (moderator) said on November 25, 2003 11:02:
I don’t think MJ is capable of this. He’s 12 himself on the inside, so for him this is just fun and games with his friends. What IS wrong though, is that he is 45 and should be able to realize that he shouldn’t be doing these things with 12-year olds... These are my thoughts.
LittleSpooky said on November 25, 2003 19:34:
teven: EXACTLY.
What does the plastic surgery, et al. have to do with anything on this? Nothing. But like I said: I stopped liking him at that point in time. So... there... I think....
Markuz said on November 25, 2003 22:49:
Only in America a poor little black bloy can turn into a rich white woman... hehehehe...
MiracleMan said on November 26, 2003 00:23:
There was a cartoon on VH1 not too long ago that had Jackson shooting a video. Unaware to himself, but frighteningly to everyone else, his face kept falling off, revealing his skull with two bulgy eyeballs.
Everytime I see a photo of him recently—especially his mugshot—I see that image in my head.
DaminehGessle said on November 26, 2003 20:56:
I was supposed to not write in this thread but after reading these words, I couldn’t keep quite. It literally brought tears to my eyes and made me feel good that at least there are some people in this world who use their brains. As it was a jpg file, I typed it up:
November 21, 2003
“Lots of time to think. I feel desperately sad for Michael Jackson. Everybody seems to assume he’s guilty already, but it’s certainly hard for me to believe this boy has a single bad bone in his body. I haven’t had any significant contact with Michael for some years (aside from a brief conversation at Liza’s wedding, which sadly turned out to be doomed). But the Michael Jackson I know would be incapable of any kind of ‘attack’ on a child. I notice the little boy in question was suffering from cancer – it’s easy to imagine a generous (and naive) MJ feeling a great call to help. And forming a friendship might be totally innocent, but could be (perhaps deliberately) misconstrued to bring him down. I shall definitely be considering him innocent until his guilt is proved to MY satisfaction. I don’t trust anybody’s motives these days – at least no-one who can make money or attain power by causing pain to others.
Now Michael Jackson, who has worked his whole life to make music that made the world dance – him, instinctively, I trust.
Love,
Brian”
__________________________________________
November 26, 2003
“My God - what has happened to the world? Where did our ’civilization’ go? “Innocent until proven guilty”? And this vindictive woman wants to take a man’s children away from Michael Jackson before the trial has even started, let alone been concluded with a verdict which would justify such a course???
In thin in international law this lawyer ought to be arraigned for 3 attempted civil rights violations. The civil right of every child is to have the access he or she needs to both their parents. I think it’s high time this was taken seriously in this country too, with so many separated mothers making a mockery of the law by denying their children the right to see their father. To my mind, this is a vicious and unforgivable crime against the child.
Appalling misuses like this make me want to be a politician – but Heaven knows where that path leads – does success in that arena require being as corrupt as the rest of them?? Ye Gods.
Love
Brian May”
DaminehGessle said on November 26, 2003 21:06:
His looks have nothing to do with what’s going on inside of him.
animalkingdom: I have a new respect for you. When we were arguing the case with a few classmates the other day, the brought up the fact that kids sleep in his bed. I said: so??? What does that indicate? They said who sleeps in a 45-year old’s bed? What do they do? I said you think whoever sleeps in someone else’s bed should be doing things with him? So they started arguing and then I said: You know what? You all think I am an angel I don’t have a boyfriend so I don’t do shit. YOu all know me as who I am, kind, helpful, there for all of you in need and .... How would you react if I tell you I have guys sleeping in MY bed beside me all the time? How would you react if I tell you I have had my friends staying over at my house, sleeping in my bed overnight? Would you think I am a wh*re? Would you think I am having sex with each and every one of them? No. Cause we don’t even go there. We don’t dare thinking about it. It’s friendship. If you are pure inside, you don’t think of anything other than friendship. This makes me uncomfortable hanging out with my friends, hanging out with any guy I want to be friends with. And I went on and on.... They shut up.
That’s what I believe in. And I believe what I quoted from Brian. It’s a stupid crazy world filled with people who have no sense of judgement and when they judge, ... It’s sad!
Shane said on November 26, 2003 21:33:
I am not sure MJ is guilty or not but I think the parents of this child should be charged with reckless endangerment. No one who loves his/her child would leave that child alone, over night, with a 45 year old man who has, in the past, been accused of abusing kids! They set the kid up (and maybe set up MJ) for money.
I also think MJ needs someone in his camp to tell him to smarten up. Even if he has done nothing illegal, his actions are setting him up to be charged.
wendy said on November 26, 2003 21:41:
Looks guilty to me....
Naughty naughty boy,barbie,doll,whatever :p
Markuz said on November 26, 2003 22:44:
Ok I’ve been keeping myself from posting this but what the hell...
My opinion? Well, I find it VERY suspicious that this thing pop ups NOW. For me it’s just a huge SMOKE CURTAIN.
How’s that? Well, Bush is in the UK and oh my, things didn’t go as planned. The streets are FLOODED with anti-Bush demonstrations... I mean, English citizens against Bush! Mother nation against his own son!
Of course, none of the american networks (CNN, CBS, FOX and NBC News) showed those events to their american viewers. And now this whole Michael Jackson thing is going to be in the media until the elections. Did I hear someone say “RE-ELECTION”? Uh?
It’s not a new thing. Remember when during the Clinton administration the US attacked Iraq for NO REASON and destroyed civilian objectives? Well, the whole Lewinsky scandal popped up.
MiracleMan said on November 27, 2003 00:54:
@MARKUZ: The US newmedia—papers, television, radio, you name it—ALL WITHOUT FAIL showed the demonstrations in England: the planned march, the march, the throngs of protesting Brits, the toppling effigy, including interviews with the demonstrators themselves—THE WHOLE BLOODY THING—THE DAY it happened and for days after.
Perhaps you should be in the US watching the television, listening to the radio, or reading our papers before you make a sweeping statement the we had no idea what went on with our President in your country.
And to think that the raid on Michael Jackson’s home and his subsequent arrest has anything to do with the US not knowing what’s going on in your country is off the radar conspiracy paranoia. It’s also incredibly insulting. To think we in the US are ignorant of the world and blindly agree with everything our government tells and shows us—and that we are that easily distracted—is also unbelievably insulting. And for that matter, Tony Blair is catching all sorts of hell for dragging the United Kindom into the war, just like Bush.
Clinton got called on the carpet by the US for that Iraq attack here too, by the way.
Michael Jackson is criminally charged with child molestation because a child reported it and the police acted on the allegations with an investigation, a home search, and a warrant for his arrest. It has nothing to do with re-elections or misdirection the public’s attention away from protests. There’s no second gunman here.
coyboyusa said on November 27, 2003 01:21:
his looks have everything to do with whats going on inside of him....his lack of self image came froim years of parerntal abuse and trauma that went on in his childhood that his parents didn’t help him cope with....his father only saw the money from his sons’ success and his m,other was a battered woman ...so rember he’s a product of abuse taken to an extreme...but it doesn’t ever excuse child molestation even though 99% of all child abusers were victims of the same abuse when they were children...and on the peter townsend thing...you don’
t find it appaulling at all that he downlaoded kiddie porn...it was a paysite tooo so he paid someoen who is distributing kiddie porn he belongs in jail too
coyboyusa said on November 27, 2003 01:21:
his looks have everything to do with whats going on inside of him....his lack of self image came froim years of parerntal abuse and trauma that went on in his childhood that his parents didn’t help him cope with....his father only saw the money from his sons’ success and his m,other was a battered woman ...so rember he’s a product of abuse taken to an extreme...but it doesn’t ever excuse child molestation even though 99% of all child abusers were victims of the same abuse when they were children...and on the peter townsend thing...you don’
t find it appaulling at all that he downlaoded kiddie porn...it was a paysite tooo so he paid someoen who is distributing kiddie porn he belongs in jail too
Markuz said on November 27, 2003 04:42:
@MiracleMan: I’m really sorry If my post offended you. I really do and I apologize.
But I have to be true to myself... And thats what I think, honestly. It’s just my opinion, ok?
But thanx for showing your disagreement. Hey, it’s a free world with freedom of speech, right? >;)
sweet_stalker57 said on November 27, 2003 06:25:
what’s brown in a baby’s diaper?
michael jackson’s hand!
sweet_stalker57 said on November 27, 2003 06:28:
Markuz, while I wouldn’t put anything past my current administration, can you really see them framing MJ to rig the election???????????
LOL!!! :)
Vixzter said on November 27, 2003 06:50:
this MJ thing has absolutely nothing to do with Bush being in the UK.
its either a: a big set up or b:true
DaminehGessle said on November 27, 2003 07:45:
Markuz you are smart :).
sweet: what the heck!!
Vixzter: I’d rather see it as a set-up which I believe would be. Just read what I posted. It amazed me. I’d rather believe he is not guilty but noone really knows, noone. Basing the whole thing on his looks or what we see or hear is not the right thing to do. So not guilty until proven. There is no reason to condemn him unless we know he did what the say he has done.
StillFar said on November 27, 2003 14:09:
MiracleMan: I actually watched US TV during the time Bush was in England and the images shown were quite different from the images we saw on Canadian networks.
Of course it’s easy to distract people at the moment. Worldwide people are tired of the news we got presented over the last few months. This scandal makes people talk about something different, everyone will have an opinion on something that doesn’t affect our life, which is way easier than dealing with more important issues.
How can you be so sure that Markuz is wrong? How difficult would it be to find one family from all those kids who ever slept on the Neverland Ranch to sue Michael, knowing that you can get a great amount of money out of it. It’s probably the BEST scandal you can possibly have, guaranteed to stay in the news for a couple of months and the best thing, you don’t even have to prove he’s guilty...
It’s all so convenient. Days after you announce a Medicare reform, then you send troops home and all appears in a slightly different way…
StillFar said on November 27, 2003 14:15:
by the way, what’s up with that prosecutor. What a joke...
LittleSpooky said on November 27, 2003 18:09:
StillFar: I feel kinda sorry for Scott Peterson right now... that clown represents him as well!
Denstandigaresan said on November 27, 2003 22:35:
On the news today, the credibility of the boy and his mother has been questioned. After they both signed under some oath, that Michael never touched the boy.
After coming from a VERY poor background, to the lap of luxury, and probably Michael has turned his attentions elsewhere, they’re worried they’ll loose their cushy lifestyle Michael has provided.
Also, that first child that Michael paid off, if that was REALLY true, the parents should’ve been taken to court for child neglect ... why? FIRST sign of that dollar sign, they took it and ran. If that had happened to my child, I would make sure he was banged up, to not harm another child, NO amount of money would deter me from that.
And yes, this is a subject I know a LOT about... Michael might be a total fruit loop, but I for one believe he has done nothing wrong. He’s overly friendly with children sure, which he doesn’t see anything wrong in. As do I. This day and age, you even speak to a child, you’re ’labelled’ as a pervert, child molester, etc., etc. , etc.
MiracleMan said on November 28, 2003 06:04:
@StillFar—Huh? More comspiracy theories? Good plot for a movie, but not really in touch with reality. And I’ll reiterate what I said about the media—I read it in the paper, listened to a lengthy report on NPR as well as other radio stations, and even watched the BBC news on PBS as well as CNN, NBC, Fox News, and other news broadcasts. The US was well aware of what went on in England while the President was there.
And I cringed every time they played the clip of Bush saying NUCULER, rather than NUCLEAR. One would think that “the leader of the free world” could pronounce such a simple word correctly—just once.
I’ll agree that people are tried in the media all the time. Is it right? Hell no! So you have Brian May and other celebrities coming out in support of Jackson and many people will already have unfortunately already decided guilty/innocent long before this gets to trial. So we wait and see until January 9th when it begins and this debate will rage on and on and on and on.
DaminehGessle said on November 28, 2003 08:16:
MM: I loved Brian May’s way of expressing his thoughts. This was not something shown on tv or on cnn’s website. These he wrote on his website diary. He is an awesome man. I was a lucky girl to meet him.
beautyqueen said on November 30, 2003 11:37:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/stories/feature.cfm?instanceid=60030
Noone said on December 1, 2003 18:54:
No surprise to me.he has always had such a strange
interrestings.Maybe he will be finally punished if he is guilty.
Echoes_of_a_Doubt said on December 12, 2003 17:08:
I think it is quite bad how everybody judges Michael for something nobody really knows the truth about... has he done it? Has he molested boys?? I don’t know! How could anyone know? I think it is not fair to judge anyone, just because of some rumors that were never proven to be true. I don’t know if he’s done anything like it, and really, I don’t care... I know, if I’d have my own kids, I wouldn’t want them to be in close contact with Michael, so if he is a child molester, and if he actually molested this current boy, I think the boys parents are at fault too... they new all the rumors about michael, so why did they allow their boy to be in such close contact with michael? I don’t know what the truth is... but I also will not judge Michael, as NO ONE was ever able to proof if he’s guilty or not....
DaminehGessle said on December 12, 2003 17:45:
The memo they found a few days ago will reveal the truth. It’s not easy to bring someone down and then mess with those minds who are ready to take any crap, is it???
Echoes_of_a_Doubt: Read my two comments on the last page. Well said from Mr. May.
Stormkeeper said on December 20, 2003 21:51:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~exadega/koons/banality/MichaelJacksonandBubbles.jp...
do you think it´s true he hit Bubbles the monkey?
coyboyusa said on December 21, 2003 14:44:
ok the world must be nuts sorry for a man that murdered his pregnant wife? dont get me wrong i used to defend jackson myself but it gets harder to refute the more you hear and more u see of his behaviour and the more you hear about his homelife
sweet_stalker57 said on December 22, 2003 00:43:
what about that secret entrance to the kids room?
wooooooo-ooooooo!!!!
http://towerwebproductions.com/vampires/pics/nosferatu3.jpg
Aaso said on January 28, 2004 14:29:
Is it real?? I’ve heard in the news that he’s not his chlidren’s biological father ....
Is that right?
powerpoplarry said on January 29, 2004 04:56:
OK, here’s my take on that whole Wacko Jacko case. Damineh, I admire your pure soul and all, and respect your opinion, but here is mine.
First off, I am not a fan, and in actuality, I am being honest here, I am a Michael Jackson hater. No, I am not an evil person at all, but I really hate the guy, can’t stand him and his music, his ego, and his looks really creep me out. I don’t feel sorry for the guy, I really hate him. Just the thought of MJ makes me violent inside!! Even when “Thriller” was new and huge back in 1982/1983, I could never understand what all the fuss was about, I found his music to be dreadful at worst, just OK at best. And just looking at all these swarms of people FAINTING at the sight of him drove me nuts!! Like, what is the big deal about his music??? VERY overrated.
On top of that, his ego and calling himself the “King Of Pop”???!!!!??? Made me steaming mad!! His music is crap, and it’s not POP music!! His stuff is crap R+B!! Per Gessle?? Roxette?? Cheap Trick?? Matthew Sweet?? Rooney?? Fountains Of Wayne?? THAT’s PROPER POP, aka POWERPOP, music!! Wacko may have been the king of POPULARITY contests back in the 80s, but not now. He is no King Of Pop, no sirree.
Oh, and Damineh, he DOES have some bad evil bones in his body. He STOLE the Beatles catalogue from under Paul McCartney’s nose!! And he won’t sell it back to it’s rightful owner(s), as he deserves no part of it!!
And when accused, he plays the racist card, which is TOTALLY hypocritical, as he is whiter than a white person, yet claims he is black. That so-called disease is utter bullcrap.
Now, with the case itself, GUILTYGUILTYGUILTY!! He was charged with the same thing 10 years ago, and paid the kid off, generating a change in Cali law. Now, charged again, guilty in both cases, as you can’t hide away from them for long. It’s likely it was covered up from the getgo.
The fact he has 12 year old kids sleeping over and in his bed is severely warped, I’m sorry, it’s just wrong and suspicious!! I blame the parents more for putting their kids in danger. Don’t get me wrong, no problem wuth them going to Neverland for the day, with supervision, go on the rides, eat candy and stuff all day, play with new toys and games, but a sleepover with a 45-year old stranger, unsupervised?? Are you nuts??? And I wouldn’t trust Wacko with my kids (when I have them), dangling the baby from the balcony, covering them up like many in the Mid East.
I’m sorry, but I HOPE he goes down, gets all charges, and goes to jail for a longlonglong time...good riddance...
Jud (moderator) said on January 29, 2004 08:07:
nah.. most of the times it is unknown and poor people going to the jail the others find their way out..
powerpoplarry said on January 30, 2004 04:21:
Not this time, Wacko is going to jail, woohoo!! It was just revealed in the newspapers today that the wacko DID serve wine to this kid, and many others, in COKE CANS!! There apparently are codewords he uses for these drinks: Jesus Juice for white wine, and Jesus Blood for red wine. Turns out all those kids knew about him and serving kids booze.
In Coke Cans!!!! That’s low, and the beginning of his world falling apart, him going to jail, everything. He is DONE, and I am on Cloud 9!!!
kachina008 said on January 30, 2004 08:02:
This has nothing to do with MJ, but your utter and total glee over another human being’s fate is appalling, powerpoplarry. for shame.
Jud (moderator) said on January 30, 2004 10:00:
well I wouldn’t call a “thing” that abuses children (as well as many other criminals) a “person”... who should be ashamed is MJ!
kachina008 said on January 30, 2004 10:25:
whatever happened to “innocent till proven otherwise”?
but that wasn’t even what I was talking about. anyway.
MiracleMan said on January 30, 2004 13:26:
COKE cans? Is that because the deal with Pepsi went south?
powerpoplarry said on February 1, 2004 07:10:
Kachina, Wacko is someone I have despised for the past 20 years, so I am sorry you find it appalling, but just his popping up uninvited at media events, and being his stupid, pathetic self, moonwalking and making me sick, I am just THRILLED he is going down!! Not that that, but his fans (who are all hardcore), and antics in the media, just keep rubbing in his Wacko-ness, and I’m sorry, but I just get violent, I can’t help it.
His going to jail, justifiably, just feels like a relief, for my sanity. I just have issues when it comes to the wacko, and no, it’s not some childhood psychological issues either. I try to avoid the “guy” but it’s damn near impossible, with all these media sticts.
That’s why I feel such glee...I’m sorry, but I am just being honest, I can’t lie...that, plus his music is possibly the worst music ever made...in my opinion...
I don’t feel this way towards anyone else, just this wacko...just telling you...
city_girl said on February 19, 2004 01:09:
He deserves to be in jail for life. He’s a freak. I swear he’s like an alien from outerspace. He’s just an ugly thing-he doesn’t even look like a man or a guy. I feel bad for his kids cuz they gonna turn out to be rapists or killers.
purplemedusa said on November 19, 2003 19:20:
Suprising.... I don’t think so!!