The Daily Roxette discussions forum has been closed. The forum is only available as a read-only archive.
LIVE PERFORMANCE PART II
4 replies
darkblade said on March 7, 2003 10:22:
thanks hotblooded for your insults.......
i am not trying to offend anyone with my comments, i just wanted to know if there was anyone who shared my opinion....because i was really dissapointed hearing ROXETTE LIVE......in fact I LOVE Roxette and I think they are the best, but i wonder how come they are not able to show their beautiful music on stage, they just spoil everything.....and if there is at least one person who shares my view(and there is) you should think twice before replying to my post, it certainly has a part of truth......I would like to watch a recent performance in which I could appreciate the beautiful voice of Marie and Per.......but it seems that only in old performances we can appreciate that.........
IV_ROX said on March 7, 2003 12:23:
Look, darkblade, I think you’ve had enough of explanations why you seem to be all wrong.
I saw Roxette live in Vienna(02.Nov. 2001) and I was thrilled of their live performance! GREAT VOCALS!!!! GREAT PRESENCE on stage!!!!
SkyDrum said on March 8, 2003 03:11:
You don’t seem to like Rox at all, and if it was so, why are you saying they’re bad playing live?
I give you an example: Bon Jovi has a beautiful voice and reaches very well the high notes. But... when they toured in the beginning of the ’90s, he used to sing always reaching the high notes in every concert they gave... The result: Bon Jovi had to rest his voice for some time because it was really tired and he just couldn’t sing. Now, they play live in mid-note and it sounds great, at least for me, and that doesn’t mean they’re awful playing live... The same story happened once with Elvis, would you believe it?
Hope this could have helped you...
Sascha said on March 7, 2003 11:17:
Isn’t one thread about this not enough? It’s getting boring...