Marie should sing the chorus!
Boy_on_the_moon said on January 27, 2003 20:24:
Why doesn’t Marie sing the chorus??? It would be more logical (from the lyric-side), and I think she would give the chorus the power it deserves. The lyrics are very good (=really Per) and the beat is also really groovy!
Markuz said on January 27, 2003 21:00:
I don’t think that’s Marie singing the vacking vocals. I used Winamp’s Karaoke and it sounds like Per in a higher key. But then the clip sounds like shit so who knows...
joyrider said on January 27, 2003 21:11:
i had this feeling to, that this backing-voice isn’t marie’s voice...
ernes said on January 27, 2003 21:16:
I think she is doing the second voice.
This new songs where almost completed before the ballad hits promotion (I think so) and also Per told that a few weeks ago (during Marie’s illnes) that she was able to record some things for the new songs.
Ernes.
rox-kuryliw said on January 27, 2003 21:51:
doesnt sound like her, sounds like enhance per vocals pitch higher used, might be marie, she might be in another part i hope.
i like it when, she put the power into the chorus. real sugar ish.
coyboyusa said on January 27, 2003 22:29:
per said that marie sang a verse and the chorus i believe but it sound more like a duo effort like real sugar :)
marcusvandeursen said on January 27, 2003 23:41:
just wait and see, we haven’t heard the entire thing yet... still love what i’ve heard so far... a song with energy!
Santi said on January 29, 2003 13:38:
I believe what we’ve heard is the first chorus (it seems pretty clear anyway) and in the second Marie joins the backing vocals. A lot of songs have that structure.
colinvdbel (moderator) said on January 29, 2003 13:51:
Per sings the chorus great!!!! It’s a real Per song :)
Santi said on January 27, 2003 20:28:
Hey boy, the song is already recorded, was almost completely recorded when Marie fell down and the whole cancer thing came up. She had to record the backing vocals, so... maybe she was never able to record them. She was very ill...